Match statistics snapshot
- U.
- Catolica was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 9%).
- Everton de Vina held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| 6 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 280 | Total passes | 457Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.