Match statistics snapshot
- U.N.A.M.
- - Pumas fired more attempts (23 vs 6 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 9Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 408Lead | Accurate passes | 111 |
| 480Lead | Total passes | 184 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |