Match statistics snapshot
- Pachuca created the clearer chances on xG (0.29 vs 1.15, Δ 0.86).
- Pachuca fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Pachuca was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 0.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 282 |
| 561Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.10 | Goals prevented | 0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Pachuca |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.