Match statistics snapshot
- U.N.A.M.
- - Pumas fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 228 | Accurate passes | 423Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| U.n.a.m. - Pumas | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |