Match statistics snapshot
- Dundalk fired more attempts (23 vs 7 shots).
- Dundalk was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
- Dundalk held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ucd | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ucd | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 50% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 106 | Accurate passes | 462Lead |
| 210 | Total passes | 562Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ucd | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ucd | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ucd | Statistic | Dundalk |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |