Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 1.68, Δ 0.70).
- Como fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Udinese was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 321 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 390 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.38 | Goals prevented | -0.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |