Match statistics snapshot
- Udinese created the clearer chances on xG (1.98 vs 1.49, Δ 0.49).
- Como fired more attempts (20 vs 16 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
| 16 | Total shots | 20Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 512Lead |
| 400 | Total passes | 582Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.01 | Goals prevented | -0.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Udinese | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |