Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Arabi SC fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- UMM Salal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
- Al-Arabi SC held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Umm Salal | Statistic | Al-arabi Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 3 |
| 12Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Umm Salal | Statistic | Al-arabi Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 507Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 580Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Umm Salal | Statistic | Al-arabi Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Umm Salal | Statistic | Al-arabi Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Umm Salal | Statistic | Al-arabi Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.