Match statistics snapshot
- Union Berlin created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 0.59, Δ 0.38).
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Union Berlin | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Union Berlin | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 345Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Union Berlin | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Union Berlin | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| 0.17 | Goals prevented | 0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Union Berlin | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |