Match statistics snapshot
- Union Espanola fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 38%).
- Union Espanola held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Union Espanola | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Union Espanola | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 365Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 441Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Union Espanola | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Union Espanola | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Union Espanola | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.