Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad Catolica fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- Universidad Catolica held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad Catolica | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad Catolica | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 308Lead | Accurate passes | 137 |
| 348Lead | Total passes | 180 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad Catolica | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad Catolica | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad Catolica | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Fouls | 2Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |