Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 24%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 553Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.