Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile created the clearer chances on xG (2.02 vs 0.50, Δ 1.52).
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (25 vs 7 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 2.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 473Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 541Lead | Total passes | 288 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.