Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile created the clearer chances on xG (4.50 vs 0.14, Δ 4.36).
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (44 vs 7 shots).
- Universidad de Chile was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Deportes Copiapo |
|---|---|---|
| 4.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.14 |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 25Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 16Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 44Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Deportes Copiapo |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 53% |
| 488Lead | Accurate passes | 111 |
| 563Lead | Total passes | 208 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Deportes Copiapo |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Deportes Copiapo |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 11Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Deportes Copiapo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.