Match statistics snapshot
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 11%).
- Everton de Vina held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 137 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 205 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.