Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Universidad de Chile was more accurate in front of goal (59% on target vs 45%).
- Everton de Vina held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 210 | Accurate passes | 336Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.