Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 423Lead | Accurate passes | 148 |
| 531Lead | Total passes | 232 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |