Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 1.07, Δ 0.57).
- O'Higgins fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Universidad de Chile was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 500Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | O'higgins |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |