Match statistics snapshot
- Palestino created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 1.05, Δ 0.06).
- Palestino fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 408Lead | Accurate passes | 168 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 247 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| -0.24 | Goals prevented | -0.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universidad De Chile | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |