Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 0.30, Δ 0.72).
- Universitatea Cluj fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 406Lead | Accurate passes | 377 |
| 479Lead | Total passes | 461 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Afc Hermannstadt |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |