Match statistics snapshot
- Chindia Targoviste created the clearer chances on xG (0.46 vs 0.97, Δ 0.51).
- Chindia Targoviste fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 0.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 532Lead | Accurate passes | 380 |
| 610Lead | Total passes | 451 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |