Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 1.18, Δ 0.04).
- Universitatea Cluj fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Dinamo Bucuresti was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 63%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 435Lead | Accurate passes | 422 |
| 524Lead | Total passes | 506 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.