Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 0.37, Δ 0.17).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (7 vs 3 shots).
- FC Botosani was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.37 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 7Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 64%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 245Lead |
| 369 | Total passes | 386Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.