Match statistics snapshot
- FC Botosani created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.60, Δ 0.65).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (21 vs 11 shots).
- FC Botosani was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 312 | Accurate passes | 334Lead |
| 402 | Total passes | 426Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |