Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 1.40, Δ 0.17).
- Universitatea Cluj fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 314 | Accurate passes | 436Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 524Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.