Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 1.12, Δ 0.42).
- Rapid fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 275Lead | Accurate passes | 230 |
| 361Lead | Total passes | 312 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.