Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 0.68, Δ 0.65).
- Rapid fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 389Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 487Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.