Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 2.03, Δ 0.16).
- Rapid fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.03Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 346Lead | Accurate passes | 310 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.