Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
- Rapid held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 389 | Accurate passes | 456Lead |
| 454 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Cluj | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.