Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Craiova created the clearer chances on xG (1.73 vs 0.91, Δ 0.82).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
- FCSB held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 1.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 434Lead |
| 349 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 1Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |