Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (0.30 vs 0.69, Δ 0.39).
- Universitatea Craiova fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 325 | Accurate passes | 339Lead |
| 409 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Universitatea Craiova | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.