Match statistics snapshot
- Rosengård W created the clearer chances on xG (0.42 vs 2.75, Δ 2.33).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (26 vs 4 shots).
- Uppsala W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uppsala W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.75Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 26Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uppsala W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 167 | Accurate passes | 302Lead |
| 259 | Total passes | 405Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uppsala W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uppsala W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uppsala W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |
Statistics is not available yet.