Match statistics snapshot
- Ural created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 0.37, Δ 0.20).
- Nizhny Novgorod fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- Nizhny Novgorod was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ural | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.37 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ural | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 395Lead |
| 421 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ural | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ural | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ural | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.