USFA 0-0 CFFEB Prediction

USFAUSFA
0 — 0FT
CFFEBCFFEB
OverviewLineupsStatisticsStandingsEventsPlayersPredictionsFormInjuriesH2H

Updated

UsfaUsfavsCffebCffeb

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Defensive grind — model leans Usfa

Estimated win chances: Usfa 44.6%, draw 32.1%, Cffeb 23.4%. From 13 and 13 competition matches.

Low tempo / cagey
TempoLow
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsLow
Tactical styleDefensive grind
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskHigh
Model confidenceMedium

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

1.09Expected goals0.70

From 13 and 13 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 1–018.3%
  • 0–016.8%
  • 1–112.8%
  • 0–111.8%
  • 2–010%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

57BuildingUsfa
Weighted momentum

Usfa carries the sharper recent run (+20 momentum).

37Cold spellCffeb
Usfa · Structured / conservativeCffeb · Structured / conservative

Usfa

6W · 3D · 4L
Recent →LWWDWWLDLWDWL
Momentum index

Cffeb

4W · 3D · 6L
Recent →LWLDLLWDWLWDL
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapUsfa +6

Usfa

21 pts
46% wins

6W · 3D · 4L · 13 played

For
13
Against
8
Goal diff +5

Cffeb

15 pts
31% wins

4W · 3D · 6L · 13 played

For
7
Against
9
Goal diff -2

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Usfa offensive edge

    Usfa's attack (83%) vs Cffeb's defense (50%).

    +33
  • Cffeb offensive edge

    Cffeb runs into a stronger home defensive profile.

    -33

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Usfa83
Cffeb17

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Usfa50
Cffeb50

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Usfa57
Cffeb37

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Usfa116
Cffeb-16

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Usfa30
Cffeb30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Usfa71
Cffeb29

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Usfa0
Cffeb0
UsfaStructured / conservative
CffebStructured / conservative