Match statistics snapshot
- CFR 1907 Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (0.27 vs 2.31, Δ 2.04).
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Uta Arad was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.31Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 376Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.