Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (0.30 vs 0.59, Δ 0.29).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Uta Arad was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 462 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 543 | Total passes | 591Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.