Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (2.44 vs 3.54, Δ 1.10).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (24 vs 16 shots).
- Uta Arad was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 2.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.54Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 210 | Accurate passes | 360Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.