Match statistics snapshot
- FC Botosani created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 1.85, Δ 0.62).
- FC Botosani was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
- Uta Arad held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.85Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 495Lead | Accurate passes | 254 |
| 581Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.