Match statistics snapshot
- Uta Arad created the clearer chances on xG (3.15 vs 1.25, Δ 1.90).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- Uta Arad was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 3.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 181 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |