Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 1.29, Δ 0.25).
- Uta Arad fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 218 | Accurate passes | 468Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 557Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.