Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 2.99, Δ 1.03).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.99Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 435Lead | Accurate passes | 320 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 425 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.