Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 1.70, Δ 0.49).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Uta Arad was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 196 | Accurate passes | 364Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |