Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 1.22, Δ 0.16).
- Uta Arad fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Uta Arad was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 229 |
| 564Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.