Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 2.73, Δ 2.22).
- Uta Arad fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Oţelul was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.73Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 257 | Accurate passes | 318Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 418Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Uta Arad | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.