Match statistics snapshot
- Bay FC fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Bay FC was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 27%).
- Bay FC held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 331 | Total passes | 457Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.