Match statistics snapshot
- North Carolina Courage W fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- North Carolina Courage W was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 343Lead |
| 380 | Total passes | 411Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |