Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Thorns W fired more attempts (4 vs 3 shots).
- Portland Thorns W was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 33%).
- Utah Royals W held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 1Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 4Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 182Lead | Accurate passes | 105 |
| 215Lead | Total passes | 141 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 1Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |