Match statistics snapshot
- Utah Royals W fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Utah Royals W was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
- Utah Royals W held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 368Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 451Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |