Match statistics snapshot
- San Diego Wave W fired more attempts (6 vs 4 shots).
- Utah Royals W was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 67%).
- San Diego Wave W held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 6Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 309Lead |
| 275 | Total passes | 381Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utah Royals W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |