Match statistics snapshot
- Academia Cantolao fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- UTC Cajamarca was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 35%).
- Academia Cantolao held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 166 | Accurate passes | 358Lead |
| 250 | Total passes | 449Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Utc Cajamarca | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.